A doctor built a ventilator tool in 4 minutes using Claude

person sitting while using laptop computer and green stethoscope near

A peer-reviewed technical note published in Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain Medicine documents something that should interest anyone experimenting with AI-assisted tooling: a single physician built a functional, tested clinical decision-support application in 4 minutes and 25 seconds, with no programming experience required.

What Was Built

The tool is called VentiProtect ARDS. It assists with real-time ventilator titration for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), a condition where lung-protective ventilation is frequently under-applied at the bedside because integrated decision-support tools don’t exist.

The application computes six clinical values: predicted body weight, tidal volume, driving pressure, respiratory system compliance, mechanical power, and oxygenation index. It adds real-time color-coded alerts and an active suggestion engine that calculates exact corrective ventilator settings.

How It Was Built

The physician, Sacha Rozencwajg, used a structured eight-block prompt submitted to Claude Opus 4.6 via the Antigravity agentic development environment. The approach described in the paper is what the authors call physician prompt engineering: translating clinical knowledge into a natural-language specification that constrains LLM code generation, rather than writing code directly.

The prompt went through an iterative pre-prompt reasoning process before submission. The entire session ran 4 minutes 25 seconds.

Verification

Formula accuracy was tested using an independent automated test suite of 100 scenarios covering 1,400 individual checks. No computational errors were identified. The tool runs locally with no installation, no network dependency, and no patient data transmission.

The Operator Angle

The paper frames this as a proof-of-concept for a broader claim: domain experts in any field may be able to build working, accurate tools for their specific workflows without depending on software vendors or engineers. The authors are careful to note that a single self-performed case cannot establish this across all physicians, but the result is a clean data point.

The line that closes the abstract is worth keeping: “The LLM generates syntax. The physician generates medicine.”

Stay on top of AI & Automation with BizStack Newsletter
BizStack  —  Entrepreneur’s Business Stack
Logo