More AI code, same software output: what a 700-firm study found

a computer screen with a bunch of code on it

Your AI coding agent is writing more code than ever. According to a new study from Harvard University, that extra code is not translating into more shipped software.

What the Study Measured

Researchers Fiona Chen and James Stratton analyzed aggregated engineering data from Jellyfish, a platform that tracks granular output across engineering teams. The dataset covers 300 million individual work events (commits, pull requests, and issue management activity) across more than 700,000 employees at over 700 software development firms, spanning 2021 through March 2026.

The researchers tracked exactly when each firm introduced AI coding assistants or AI coding agents, then ran a difference-of-differences regression to measure before-and-after changes on key output variables.

The Numbers

The raw code volume jump after AI agent adoption is hard to miss:

  • +30 percent in total lines of code generated
  • +20 percent in total commits
  • +23 percent in pull requests

On the surface, that looks like a productivity win. The problem shows up one layer down. Resolution rates for Issues and Epics tracked in tools like Jira did not change in a statistically significant way after AI tools were introduced. The researchers also found no shift in the size or complexity of those tracked issues, ruling out the possibility that teams were simply tackling harder problems.

Where the Efficiency Goes

The study identifies human code review as the bottleneck that swallows the gains. More AI-generated code means more review volume, more pull request revisions, and more reviewer comments. The efficiency added during the coding phase gets absorbed downstream before it reaches actual software output.

The researchers conclude there is little evidence that firms increase software output or reduce employment by using AI coding tools, at least at current adoption levels and with current review practices.

For solo operators and small teams shipping their own products, the implication is direct: adding an AI coding agent to your workflow without adjusting how you review output may produce more code to manage rather than faster product delivery.

Stay on top of AI & Automation with BizStack Newsletter
BizStack  —  Entrepreneur’s Business Stack
Logo