Stephen Downes spent a morning with ChatGPT and shipped a working collaborative slide editor. Primitive, he says, but functional. The six weeks of work he estimates it would have taken otherwise never happened.
The piece he’s reacting to, written by Miguel Guhlin, frames vibe-coding as the publishing equivalent of blogging: just as blogs cut out gatekeepers and let anyone publish, Gen AI lets anyone build just-in-time software without an enterprise vendor or a professional dev team in the middle.
The Operator Case
The argument is straightforward. You hit a problem. You look at available products. You ask yourself whether you could just build it. A session with ChatGPT later, you have something that works. The intermediary company and their codebase never enter the picture.
Guhlin documents his own examples from a summer of vibe-coding. Downes adds his own morning as a data point. Neither is claiming production-grade software. They’re claiming that for a class of problems, the build-it-yourself path is now faster than the buy-and-configure path.
The Takeaway
If you’ve been paying a SaaS subscription for something narrow and specific, it’s worth asking whether one focused ChatGPT session could replace it. The answer won’t always be yes. But the honest question is worth asking more often than most operators currently do.
